Posted by: ushistoryfiles | April 18, 2013

Bunker Hill & A Random Thought

nathaniel-philbric-Bunker-Hill-Cover-198x300

Greetings Everyone,

My review copy of Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution arrived today.  This is the book featured in our giveaway that I wrote about last week.  There is still time to enter the contest – it is open until April 21, 2013.  Details can be found here.

Random Thought

1.  Anyone else out there suffering from allergies?  This year I’ve got it bad.  I know moving to a new location often means subjecting ones-self to new allergens, but all I want to do is sleep.  The allergy medication does a good job of keeping away the weepy and itchy eyes, stuffy nose, and such so I am lucky there.  Hopefully, the sleepy-time will come to an end soon.

Our forefathers had to suffer from allergies.  Diary accounts where someone is always sick with a head cold is a good indicator – especially if that “head cold” pops up at the same time every year.

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | April 10, 2013

USHistoryFiles Book Giveaway!

I have been offered a copy of Nathaniel Philbrick’s  new book, Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution, for a giveaway on USHistoryFiles.  First about the book:

Now about the contest:

It is open to U.S. Residents only.

To enter do any of the following:

1.  Follow USHistoryFiles on Twitter and tweet “@USHistoryFiles #book #giveaway”.  And add a link to this post. – OR -

2.   Share this post via, Twitter, Facebook, Google+, etc…  MAKE SURE you post in the comments section below that you shared this post.  - OR -

3.  Sign-up to follow USHistoryFiles via email AND leave a comment on the bottom of this post.

The fine print:

1. There are 3 ways to enter (see above).  Each individual is allowed only one entry (you do not get 2 entries for sharing via Twitter AND Facebook – I’d like the exposure, but I don’t want you to annoy your friends/followers).  <grin>

2.  You must have a valid US mailing address to receive Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution.

3.  Entries will be accepted until 11:59 PM (Eastern Daylight Time) on April 21, 2013.

Good Luck!

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | March 28, 2013

Zebulon Vance Birthplace – Update

Last week I wrote about the possible closing of the Zebulon Vance Birthplace in North Carolina due to the governor’s budget.  This week I thought I would give an update.  Putting my money where my mouth is, I emailed the 3 House representatives from Buncome County where the Vance Birthplace is located.  They are Susan C. Fisher, Tim D. Moffitt, and Nathan Ramsey.  Of the three Nathan Ramsey did respond to my email indicating that he was opposed to the governor’s proposal and was working with the Asheville Chamber and the Town of Weaverville to come up with an alternative.  (In fact, he responded about an hour and a half after my email, around 11 PM, from his iPhone!)  The other two representatives did not bother to respond.

In addition, some folks have started a petition here that you can go sign if you are so inclined.  I am heading over there now to sign.

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | March 21, 2013

Ah, It’s Only History

Ever since sequester started my personal Facebook news feed has seen daily posts about how budget problems are impacting National Parks and Historic sites.  Hours are being cut, park buildings are being closed, and even campgrounds (one would think a money maker) are being effected.  In the all to rampant panic over the budget, history and nature are starting to take a beating.

Sadly, budget problems are not limited to the nation’s capital.  The Asheville-Citizen Times reported that the governor’s proposed budget would close four historic sites in North Carolina including the birthplace of Zebulon Vance.  A couple of years ago, the state of Georgia took a whack at the budget of New Echota State Park and the Chief Vann House.  The Cherokee Nation even offered to help.

So what are we – those who love history and love visiting these places to do?  Well, unless you happen to be Bill Gates, Waren Buffet, or Oprah, financially probably not much.  However, whenever we see such a story, we can make our voice heard.  Even if it is only to ask representatives to look a little longer and a little harder at finding the money elsewhere.  People spoke out on behalf of the Loudoun Museum in Leesburg, Virginia and made a difference (see more here).

If you are interested in trying to make a difference you can contact the North Carolina General Assembly and let them know how you feel.

NOTE: This is not a “this or that party is evil” post, but rather a “how can we as the history loving type” (I assume you are at least interested in history or you wouldn’t be reading this blog) get a say in this process.  There are plenty of lobbyists in Washington and State capitals and I’ll bet none of them represents the interests of the historical community.  Now wouldn’t that be something – a History lobbyist!

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | January 28, 2013

Guest Blogger – Gene Smith

In our last post we looked at The Slaves’ Gamble by Gene Smith.  Dr. Smith has been gracious enough to write a guest post describing the War of 1812 and race relations.  In a sense, a preview of his book if you will.

smith

Long before the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, the War of 1812 provided an opportunity for slaves to throw off their chains of bondage. In this story, Gene Allen Smith, a history professor at Texas Christian University, recreates the growing conflicts between the fledgling United States, Great Britain, Spain, and various Native American groups, and shows how each “tried to mobilize the free black and slave populations in the hopes of defeating the other.” The Slaves’ Gamble describes how real people struggled to find freedom during the War of 1812. By using real stories, this book describes the contributions that free blacks and slaves as a group made to the British war effort, to American defenses, to the Spanish attempts to preserve their North American empire along the Gulf of Mexico, to Native American communities trying to retain their freedom and sovereignty, and to maroon communities trying to remain outside of white control. During the years prior to the War of 1812 African Americans had gained increased political, economic, and civic rights; many of these concessions had been won by black participation during the War for Independence and their support for a new political system based on the primacy of the United States. When the War of 1812 began, they consciously chose the side they would support, and those tenuous choices dramatically impacted their future freedom and opportunity as well as the future of the United States.

The Slaves’ Gamble looks at African American combatants during the War of 1812 as a way to understand the conflict and the evolution of racial relations during the early nineteenth century. Black participants—slaves and freemen both—had to choose sides and these choices ultimately defined their individual and collective identities. Canadian slaves escaped south into Michigan during the first decade of the nineteenth century and joined the militia in Detroit and later surrendered with General William Hull in August 1812; this contradicts common perceptions that the Underground Railroad always ran north to freedom in Canada. For a very few years during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the route to freedom proceeded south from Canada to the free territories of the Old Northwest. Along the Chesapeake Bay during 1813 and 1814 many slaves joined the British Colonial Marines and later marched with Redcoats on Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, while others chose to remain with their masters. During the fall of 1814 in New York City, Philadelphia, and Baltimore, slaves and free blacks joined alongside white American workers to construct defenses for those cities. Later in 1814 along the coast of Georgia and South Carolina slaves had to choose sides, while along the Gulf of Mexico slaves found multiple choices—some joined with the Spanish, some with Native American tribes, and others with the British. During the weeks before the climactic January 1815 Battle of New Orleans, both the British and General Andrew Jackson competed for slaves and free blacks, yet Jackson ultimately secured their assistance with promises of freedom and equality that never fully appeared.

Many slaves saw this jostling for their loyalties as “an avenue to freedom,” and consequently joined armies or communities of Native Americans or mulattoes on the fringes of society. Drawing on myriad archival materials, Smith chronicles the stirring stories of individuals like Detroit slave Peter Denison used the chaos of war to flee to freedom in British Canada after the conflict; Prince Whitten, who escaped slavery in South Carolina and fled with his family to Florida where he gained freedom and a place in the Spanish colony; or slave Charles Ball of Maryland who escaped bondage and consciously crafted the identity of a free man, only to have the image crumble after the war when he was enslaved again.

The War of 1812 did not create opportunities for all slaves, as for the most part slaves fled or joined militias only when hospitable troops were in the area. Those who remained in the United States generally remained in bondage, while those who took the chance to flee to British lines were ultimately evacuated from the United States. They found freedom in British colonies such as Bermuda, Canada, or Trinidad, where they and many of their descendants remained impoverished economically. This gripping tale of the evolution of race relations in early America reveals how they won their freedom.

By the time the War of 1812 ended the United States had reaffirmed its political, economic, and cultural freedom, and white Americans had finally realized that armed blacks posed serious threats to the existing status quo, and that threat would have to be eliminated. The optimism that had flowed from the Revolutionary period into the War of 1812 era lost its influence on American southerners who still maintained their human property, but thereafter had to worry about holding onto it. In the end, the free blacks and slaves who had sided with the Americans, like those who had joined with the British, the Spanish, or with Native Americans, wanted only one thing—their land of the FREE. While the War of 1812 confirmed the security of the United States, it also provided the last chance for blacks as a group to secure their freedom through force of arms until the American Civil War finally ended slavery once and for all.

Gene Smith

smith

 

The War of 1812 is one subject in American History that receives little attention.  In fact, last year was the centennial of the start of the war but was overshadowed by the sesquicentennial of the Civil War.  When I saw that a new book was being released, and one that examined slaves participation in said war, I was interested.  Gene Allen Smith is a professor of History at Texas Christian University and has several books under his belt.  In The Slaves’ Gamble, he has crafted a well researched work that looks at slaves role in the war.

Smith sees the War of 1812 as a turning point in race relations.  in the introduction he points out that after the American Revolution, the institution of slavery was not yet entrenched in the U.S.  In the spirit of the American Revolution, northern states were moving away from the institution even some southern states like Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware were making manumission easier.

With the outbreak of the war slaves had a choice to make.  Much like during the American Revolution, they had the opportunity of joining the British, hoping to gain eventual freedom.  Areas in the South saw British raids led to the potential for slaves to flee to the British and seek freedom.  Both the prospect of seeing armed ex-slaves in British uniforms or simply losing property to the British caused southern slaveholders to attempt to tighten their grip on slaves.

Smith begins the book with a brief look at the use of slaves during wartime in the colonial period giving the reader a sense of the state of race relations at the start of the War of 1812.  He then tells the tale of the war entwining the contributions of slave and free black in the various theaters of the war.

For those interested in the history of slavery, the War of 1812, or the Civil War, The Slaves’ Gamble is an excellent read that will shed some new light on race relations of the period.

 

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | November 14, 2012

Book Review – Desperate Sons

 

Desperate Sons tells the story of the group known as the Sons of Liberty.  When one thinks of the beginnings of the American Revolution, events such as the Boston Masacre, the Boston Tea Party, Paul Revere’s midnight ride, and Lexington and Concord spring readily to mind.  Individuals such as Jefferson, Washington, John and Sam Adams are familiar as well; but how many people think of the group known as the Sons of Liberty?  For many, the Sons of Liberty are a nebulous force that we know helped bring about the American Revolution, but putting our finger on exactly what they did can be difficult.  Desperate Sons works to bring light to the group, “who propelled the country to the breaking point”.

Standiford, opens the book with an example of the anger over the Stamp Act and how that played out in the life of Henry Van Schaack who many thought was eager to be appointed the local tax collector.  In telling the story, Standiford does an excellent job in providing the reader with the background into the passage of the Stamp Act, as well as the ugly reception it received in the colonies.

But this isn’t a book about the Stamp Act, nor is it about Albany.  Desperate Sons weaves its way throughout the colonies taking the reader to Boston, New York, South Carolina and throughout the colonies.  The reader is also provided with insights as to the events taking place in London and Parliament as both colony and mother country struggle over taxes.

Desperate Sons is an excellent read.  Standiford uses his skills in creative writing to present the historical drama that unfolds in a gripping way.  Along the journey he presents the big stories such as the aforementioned background about the Stamp Act, as well as lesser known anecdotes (the origins of tarring and feathering for example).  In addition, Standiford does make references to todays events making the book relatable (though potentially outdatable).  One criticism is a seemingly misplaced reference to Andrew Johnson in discussing the separation of the social classes in the colonial period.  Other than that, Desperate Sons is a well written book that presents a side of the origins of the American Revolution that few others have.

Desperate Sons was written by Les Standiford who is the director of the creative writing program at Florida International University.  While not trained as an academic historian (he holds a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. and Ph.D in Creative Writing) he has written several books of historical narrative before.

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | November 8, 2012

Book Review – Lincoln’s Battle with God

The good folks at Thomas Nelson sent me an advanced copy of Lincoln’s Battle with God.  Now I have to admit, with the issue that Thomas Nelson had this summer with David Barton’s book on Jefferson I was intrigued to see if the Lincoln book would be problematic.  However, Mansfield is no Barton.  Mansfield actually has an undergraduate degree in History compared to Barton’s in Religious Education.  In other words, Mansfield has been exposed to historical thought and writing to a degree that Barton has not.  So with this in mind I tackled  Lincoln’s Battle with God.

Mansfield does take historians to task for being a bit close minded when it comes to examining Lincoln’s spiritual side.  While acknowledging that sometimes cutting through the myth that surrounds Lincoln can be difficult, Mansfield argues that evidence should not be discounted simply because it does not quite fit with a preconceived notion.  He finds that events in Lincoln’s life that indicate Lincoln was a man who struggled (like many of us do) with his faith have been avoided by biographers.  Instead, Mansfield argues, historians should be willing to let Lincoln’s spirituality show.  To paraphrase: the evidence, not the myth, should lead to conclusions about Lincoln’s spirituality.

The problem, according to Mansfield, is that historians have typically taken a snapshot of Lincoln during a specific period in his life and have applied that to his whole spiritual life.

Likewise, Mansfield takes those who insist for a more religious Lincoln to task.  On the other end of the spectrum, there are those who see Lincoln as more devout than he was because of his frequent references to God.  Mansfield states, “we want conversions rather than religious journeys”.  The problem is that Lincoln was a man on a spiritual journey, one that held a healthy suspicion of the clergy as well as church culture.

Overall, I found Lincoln’s Battle with God to be a well researched, well reasoned study of Lincoln’s faith.  He paints the picture of a Lincoln who struggled with his faith in times of trial, was let down by an organized Christianity, questioned dogma that didn’t make sense, and yet still sought comfort from God.  The Lincoln that Mansfield has presented in Lincoln’s Battle with God is quite simply human.

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | October 24, 2012

U.S. Voting Rights Over Time

Back in June I was asked for some input regarding an infographic that showed the evolution of voting rights in the U.S.  I think that the final product turned out well:

With Election Day just two weeks away, we are all anxious to know who will be our President for the next four years. Aside from opposing political views, we should all agree that voting is a major privilege. While some are uninterested in politics and others are anxious to send their ballot in, the bottom line is that we all have the freedom to vote, which is a significant triumph considering the history of our nation’s voting laws. Take a stroll down memory lane with this short three minute video on the evolution of our country’s voting rights.

<br/>Source: <a href=”http://www.elocallawyers.com/infographics/democracy-distilled.html”>Democracy Distilled</a>by<a href=”http://www.elocallawyers.com”>eLocalLawyers.com</a><br/&gt;

Posted by: ushistoryfiles | October 18, 2012

What the Heck Barnes & Noble

I like books…see??…  This is about half of my book collection.  (BTW, if anyone knows of a good & inexpensive piece of book tracking software let me know.)

As I said I like books.  So when the missus told me she got a 15% coupon from Barnes & Noble, I decided that I would head over and pick up a copy of Earl J. Hess’ new book on the Knoxville Campaign.  And off to Barnes & Noble I went.  My first surprise was that it seems the local store has decimated their US History section.  Compared to what it once was it now seems tiny.  They have rearranged the section I guess hoping that customers wouldn’t notice, but the Civil War section was once 2 bookcases now it may be one if you are lucky.

Determined to use my 15% off coupon, I headed to the Customer Service desk to see if I could order it and still get the savings.  The woman was nice enough, ordered the book, and asked if I wanted it shipped to my home or the store – to have it sent to the store would cost $10 more she said!  Of course I said “home” and didn’t think much about the $10 at the time, what I WAS thinking was, “Gee, I could have ordered it off of Amazon if I had wanted it shipped to my house”.  I mean, the point of having a retail store is so that people can walk in and purchase books.

It wasn’t until later that I focused on the $10.  I mean, does it really cost that much to ship it to the store roughly 7 miles away?  And wouldn’t Barnes & Noble want me to cross the threshold of their doors anyway?  I mean, isn’t the point of advertising, sales, coupons, and so on to drive the customer to your store.  I might walk in looking for a copy of one thing and purchase several other items.  They seem to know about “impuse buying” based on the amount of garbage that they keep around the registers.  The intelligent thing to do would be to ENCOURAGE customers to enter the store to pick up their items, but then again the intelligent thing would be for them to actually have a decent stock of books (they do call themselves booksellers after all) instead of games, puzzles, and Legos.

Not sure of the wisdom of the business model, but Barnes & Noble seems to be more for browsing than for buying.

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers

%d bloggers like this: